The Effect of Classroom Interaction on Conversation Performance of EFL Learners in Binjai

  • Ratih STKIP Al Maksum Langkat
  • Fernando De Napoli Marpaung STKIP Al Maksum Langkat

Abstract

The objective of this study was to find out the significant difference before and after the students being treated by classroom interaction strategy in speaking class. The researcher used quantitative method and pre experimental design to analyze research problem. This study was conducted to the second grade students of SMAN 6 Binjai on 21th July until 5th August 2020. The data were collected through a speaking test, the test was consists of expressed argumentative text. Firstly, students had to express their opinions about the phenomenon surrounding without being given treatment. In this test, the researcher gave the topic about social media. Secondly, the students expressed their opinions after treatment. The treatment was the researcher teach the students how to expressing opinion, asking other people’s opinion and saying agreement. The test was given to measure the students’ speaking skill after treatment. The researcher investigated the data and collected the score pre- test and post-test based on the scoring system. In analyzing the data, the researcher calculated the data used t-test, the researcher checked the normality of the data using Liliefors test to find out whether the distribution of data was normal, and so the researcher used t-test to clarify whether or not his hypothesis is accepted. The research findings showed that was a difference before and after the students being treated classroom interaction in speaking class. The result of the data showed that  = 8,374 was greater than   = 2,924. It proved that the result of post-test was better than the result of pre-test. In order to find out the significance of the improvement between pre-test and post-test, t-test was applied. After having the test of significance, the result of pre-test showed that the average score of pre-test was 67. Whereas, the averages score of post-test were 73. From the data showed, the result of the post-test in speaking test was better than the result of pre-test. From the result, it could be concluded that there are the significance of the improvement from pretest and post-test

 

Keywords: classroom interaction, speaking skill

References

Brown. (2000). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagody
(2nd ed.). San Fransisco, California, USA: Longman.
Byrman, A. (2007). Social Research Methods (fourth ed.). UK: Oxford University Press.
Carter Ronald & Nunan David. (2001). Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages
(1st ed.). New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Research Design (3rd ed.). USA: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Method Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3rd ed.). USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Dawson, C. (2002). Practical Research Method (1s ed.). New York: How to Books. Ellis, R. (1990). Classroom Second Language Development. Oxford: Prentice Hall.
Fraenkel. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill Education.
Glyn Hughes, Joshepine Moate and Tiina Raatikainen. (2011). Practical Classroom English
(5th ed.). 2011, New York: Oxford University Press.
Griffee, D. T. (2012). An Introduction to Second Language Research Methods - Design and Data. USA: TESL-EJ Publications.
Harmer, J. (2006). The Practice English Language Teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Longman.
Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching (Fourth ed.). London: Pearson Education Limited.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom (2nd ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.
Hosni, S. A. (2014). Speaking Difficulties Encountered by Young EFL Learners. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(6). Hughes, R. (2011). Teaching and Researching Speaking (2nd ed.). New York, USA: Routledge.
Jack F Fraenkel , Norman E Wallen & Hyun. (2006). How to Design an Evaluate Research in Education. New York: The McGraw-Hil Companies, Inc.
Kramsch, C. (1996). Appropriate Pedagogy. ELT Journal 50, 3, 199-212.
Lockhart, J. C. (1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing Speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and Teaching Language Through Content. United States: Philadelphia:John Benjamins.
Nasruloh, M. I. (2013). Teacher-Student Interaction in a Project-Based Learning Classroom. Journal of English and Education, 142-153.
Richard, J. C. (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching Listening and Speaking: From Theory to Practice (1st ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching (Macmillan Books for Teachers) (2nd ed.). Macmillan Education.
Somayeh Azadi, Mohammad Aliakbari and Akbar Azizifar. (2015, January 15). The Role of Classroom Interaction on Improvement of Speaking Among Irian EFL Learners. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World (IJLLALW), 8(1).
Torres-Guzman, R. B. (2009). Creating Classroom Communities of Learning. Salisbury, UK: Cromwell Press Ltd.
Ur, P. (1996). A Course in Language Teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Published
2020-12-22
Section
Articles