ERROR ANALYSIS OF SUBJECT-VERB AGREEMENT ON STUDENTS’ ESSAY WRITING

  • Jonris Tampubolon Universitas Prima Indonesia, Medan, Indonesia
Keywords: Error Analysis, Subject-Verb Agreement, Tenses, Essay Writing

Abstract

The purposes of this study are: 1. To find out types of error that students make in writing English essay, and 2. To analyze how students make the
errors. The study was limited on analyzing the errors on essay writing as one of question forms on students‟ monthly exam in terms of grammar errors
dealing with the subject-verb agreement and tenses. One way to address morphological, syntactic, and lexical difficulties to learners is through error
analysis, which consists of three stages: 1) identification of errors, 2) classification of errors, and 3) identification of the causes of errors (Ferch,
Haastrup, & Phillipson, 1984:22). The data of this study were collected through observation in form of documentation. The data were analyzed by
identifying the errors that students made in their writing in terms of subject verb agreement and tenses, then classifying the sources of errors based on
Krashen‟ theory which classifies them into addition, ordering, mis information and deletion. The results of this study showed that the
students still often make errors on their writing. It can be seen also in the result that the errors in terms of tense is more dominant found in the
students‟ essay writing than the errors in terms of subject-verb agreement. There are 53.2 % percent of errors in terms of tense and the rest 46.8 % are
errors in terms of subject-verb agreement. The findings of this study showed that the number of errors made by the students on their writing is in line with
the results of the previous studies. The 186 errors in both terms subject-verb agreement and tense out of 473 total clauses has proven those studies.

References

Brown, Ann. 1983. Helping Children to Write. London: Paul Chapman Publishing
Ltd.
Brown, H. D. (1987). Principles of language learning and teaching. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Crystal, D. (1999). The penguin dictionary of language (2nd ed.). Penguin.
Ferch, C., Haastrup, K., & Phillipson, R. (1984). Learner language and language
learning. England: Multilingual Matters Ltd.
Gass, S. and Selinker, L. (1994). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory
Course. Hilsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory
course (chapter 3.2). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Gustilo, L., & Magno, C., (2012). Learners‟ errors and their evaluation: The case of
Filipino ESL writers. Philippine ESL Journal, 8, 96-113.
Hasyim, S. (2002). Error Analysis in the teaching of English. Retrieved May 27,
2016, from http://puslit2.petra.ac.id/ejournal/index.php/ing/articlePDF
Interstitial/15485/15477
James, C. (1998) Errors in Language Learning and Use. London: Longman.
James, C. (2001).Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis.
Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Krashen, S. (1981). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford:
Pergamon Press.
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics Across Cultures. University of Michigan Press, Ann
Arbor.
Lane, J., & Lange, E. (1999). Writing clearly: An editing guide (2nd Ed.). USA:
Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
Lee, E. P. (2001). Error Analysis on medical students' writing. Retrieved June 2,
2016, from http://www.stc.arts.chula.ac.th/ITUA/Papers_for_ITUA_ Proceedings/
Eunpyo-new.pdf.
Leki, L. (2001). Material, educational, an ideological challenges of teaching EFL
writing at the turn of the century. International Journal of English Studies, 1,
197-209.
Leland, C. (2002). The creative writer’s style guide. Ohio: F+W Publications, Inc.
Richards, J. C. 1974. Error analysis and second language strategies. In New frontiers in second
language learning. Eds. J. H. Schumann and N. Stenson. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury
House
Robinson, Lois. 1996. Guided Writing and Free Writing. New York: Harper and
Row
Selinker, L. 1974. „Interlanguage‟. In Richards, J. (Ed.). Error analysis: Perspectives
on Second Language Acquisition. 31-54. Essex: Longman.
Werner, P. K., Church, M. M., & Baker, L. R. (1996 a). Interactions II: A
communicative grammar (3rd ed.). Location of Publication: McGraw-Hill.
Werner, P. K., Church, M. M., & Baker, L. R. (1996 b). Mosaic One: A contentbased
grammar. Location of Publication: McGraw-Hill
Ying, S. Y. (1987). Types of errors in English compositions by Chinese students: A
research for interlanguage. Unpublished master's thesis, Fu Jen Catholic
University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Published
2020-04-15
Section
Articles