AN ANALYSIS OF LECTURERS’ METACOGNITIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES IN TEACHING ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNER AT ENGLISH EDUCATION PROGRAM OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF BENGKULU

Dwi Uswatun K; Ria Anggraini; Fetriani; Ivan Achmad N,; Eki Saputra

Dwi Uswatun K Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Ria Anggraini Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Fetriani Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Ivan Achmad N, Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu
Eki Saputra Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu

Keywords: Metacognitive Strategies, Teaching, English for Young Learner

Abstract

The purpose of this reseach was to analyze the lecturers' metacognitive learning strategies in teaching English for young learner at English Education Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu Academic year 2018/2019. The designof the research used descriptive qualitative method. The objects of this research were 60 students with open questionnaire. The instrument was check list form about metacognitive strategies skills by Anderson and Krathwohl. The researcher found that although not fully applied, with this metacognitive strategy students are more independent in learning and lecturers do not provide material repeatedly.
The lecturers should consider several teaching strategies, especially metacognitive strategies.

References

Afiefah. A. N. 2018. The Effect of Combining Metacognitive and Three Steps Interview Strategies on the Student Listening Ability at the third Semester Students Of English Study Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Skripsi.FKIP UniversitasMuhammadiyah Bengkulu.Bengkulu.

Amalia, W.P., Priyono, A., Prasetyo,B.&Supriyanto. 2012. Pengaruh Penerapan trategi Metakognitif dalam Metode Inkuiriterhadap Hasil Belajar,Unnes Journal ofBiology EducationVol.1 No.3, hlm. 65-70.

Apriyantoni, 2017.An Analysis of Lecturers’ Teaching Style in Teaching and Learning English at English Education Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu.Skripsi.FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu.Bengkulu.

Brown, A. 1987.Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-Regulation, And Other More Mysterious Mechanisms.In F. E. Weinerte& R. Fatimah and Ratna.2018.StrategiBelajar&PembelajaranDalamMeningkatkanKeterampila

n Bahasa.Pena Literasi 1(2):110. Fitriani, 2017.PengertianPendekatanMetakognitif. Access on February 2020

http://fatkhan.web.id/pengertian-pendekatan-metakognitif/ Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive Aspects of Problem Solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.),The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. 1979. Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry.American Psychologist, 34, 906 - 911. Gerlach and Ely. 1980. Teaching and Media a Systematic Approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Hidayat, A. 2014.Students’ Metacognitive Strategies in Learning English.Skripsi.FKIP Universitas Bengkulu.Bengkulu.

Hidayati, D. R. N. 2009. Teaching English For Young Learners By Using“Guessing” Games In Students’ Speaking Skil. Skripsi.Universitas Negeri Semarang. Semrang.

Iskandar M. S. 2014. Pendekatan Keterampilan Metakognitifdalam Pembelajaran Sains di Kelas.ERUDIO, 2(2), 14-19.

Kistner, S., Rakoczy, K., Otto, B., Kieme, E., & Buttner, G. 2015. Teachinglearningstrategies: The role of instructional context and teacher beliefs. Journal for EducationalResearch Online.7(1), 176 – 197.

Kolaric, L. 2017. Metacognitive Strategies in Young Learners of English.Thesis.Universitas Zagreb. Zagreb.

Kothari. 2004. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques. New Age International Ltd. 2(2), 2.

Lai, E.R. 2011. Metacognition: ALiterature Review. Pearson’sresearch report series.Fromhttps://images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/Metacognitio n_Literature_Review_Final.Pdf

Livingston, J. A. 1997. Metacognition: An Overview. (online) http://www.gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.html

Liyaningsih, G. N. I. 2017. Teachers’ Strategies in Teaching English Vocabulary to Young Learners.Skipsi.English Education Study Program.IAIN. Surakarta.

Novak,&Canas. 2008. The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and How to Construct and Use Them. http://doi.org/Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01

Rev 2008-01

Nurjizah, Windyariani, Setiono. 2018. Improving Students’ Metacognitive Awareness Through Implementing Learning Journal. JPBI. Indonesia.

Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language Learning Strategies:What every Teacher should Know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Pierce, W. 2003. Metacognition: Study Strategies, Monitoring, & Motivation. (Available at http://academic.pg.cc.md.us/~wpeirce/ MCCCTR/metacognition.htm; accessed on February 2020)

Pintrich, P. R. 2010. The Role of Metacognitive Knowledge in Learning, Teaching, and Assessing.Theory Into Practice, 4(4), 220.

Portilho and Medina. 2016. Metacognition as methodology for continuing education of teachers. Creative Education, 7(2), 1-12.

Rahmaningrum, F. A. 2018. Metacognitive Strategies Used by Students in Learning English. Skripsi.FakultasPendidikan Bahasa Yogyakarta.Yogyakarta.

Rhamadania, J. 2019. A Study of Criteria English Materials Selected by English Student in Teaching English at EYL Courses.Skripsi.FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Bengkulu.Bengkulu.

Undang-undangRepublik Indonesia No. 14 Th. 2005 Tentang Guru danDosen. 2005. Jakarta.

Undang-undangRepublik Indonesia No. 20 Th. 2003 Tentang SistemPendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta.

Vanides, Yin, Tomita, Ruiz-Primo. 2005. Concept Maps in the Science Classroom.Science Scope, 28(8), 27–31.

Wati, N. 2017.Analysis of Cognitive Strategies in Intermediet Reading Used by Second Semester Students of English Language Education Study Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Skripsi.FKIP

UniversitasMuhammadiyah Bengkulu.Bengkulu.

Wenden, A. L. 1998.Metacognitive Knowledge and Language Learning.Applied Linguistics,vol. 19, 4, pp. 515-537.

Woolfolk. 2008. Educational Psychology, Active Learning Edition, Pearson Education Inc., Boston.

Young, A., & Fry, J. D. 2008. Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.